[關鍵詞]
[摘要]
目的 利用文獻計量學的方法對中藥材及飲片質量評價研究相關的中英文文獻進行可視化分析,探究該領域的研究進展與未來發(fā)展趨勢。方法 以中國學術期刊全文數(shù)據庫(CNKI)和萬方數(shù)據庫為中文文獻數(shù)據來源,Web of Science(WOS)為英文文獻數(shù)據來源,運用VOSviewer、CiteSpace、Scimago等軟件對文獻年度發(fā)文量、期刊、作者、機構、關鍵詞等方面進行分析,繪制可視化圖譜。結果 共檢索到文獻799篇,其中中文文獻666篇,英文文獻133篇。中藥材及中藥飲片質量評價研究目前處于穩(wěn)定發(fā)展階段,發(fā)文量逐年上升。文獻作者間呈明顯的區(qū)塊化分布。中國中醫(yī)科學院中藥研究所是最大的機構合作中心。中國國家自然科學基金是最大的資金來源。中文文獻中基于新興概念、新興模式、評價體系和方法的創(chuàng)新是未來的研究重點和發(fā)展趨勢;英文文獻多以化學成分鑒定分析等為主,涉及更為細節(jié)的技術操作和評價標準問題。結論 該領域的最新進展主要集中在新技術和新評價模式的提出和應用,尚存在團隊和地區(qū)間缺乏大規(guī)模合作、研究可延續(xù)性有待加強等問題。國際間合作和競爭應重點關注日本。如何提高創(chuàng)新技術的應用穩(wěn)定性,建設安全、可靠、便捷、完備的質量評價體系是未來研究的重點和難點。
[Key word]
[Abstract]
Objective To investigate the current research progress and future trends in the quality evaluation of Chinese medicinal materials through a bibliometric analysis of both Chinese and English literature. Methods China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database were used as the source of Chinese literature data, and Web of Science (WOS) was used as the source of English literature data. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Scimago Graphica and other software were used to analyze and visualized the annual publication volume, journals, authors, institutions, keywords, etc. Results A total of 799 publications were retrieved, including 666 documents in Chinese and 133 documents in English. The research on the quality evaluation of Chinese medicinal materials is now in a stable development stage, with the number of publications increasing year by year. There is a clear modular distribution of collaborative relationships among authors, suggesting that we should strengthen collaboration across institutions and regions, as well as enhance the continuity of research themes. The research organization is represented by the Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China Academy, which was the largest institutional cooperation center in this field. Of all the studies, National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) was the largest source of funding. The innovation of Chinese literature based on emerging concepts, emerging models, evaluation systems and methods, which were the future research focus and development trend; The English literature mainly focuses on the identification and analysis of chemical components, involving more detailed technical operations and evaluation criteria. Conclusion The latest progress in this field mainly focuses on the proposal and application of new technologies and new evaluation models. However, challenges remain, including insufficient large-scale cooperation between teams and regions and a need to strengthen the sustainability of research. Notably, Japan may emerge as a strong competitor for the expansion of Chinese medicinal materials into the international market in China. How to improve the application stability of innovative technologies and build a safe, reliable, convenient and complete quality evaluation system are the focus and difficulties of future research.
[中圖分類號]
R285.64
[基金項目]
中國工程院戰(zhàn)略研究與咨詢項目:“新時代中醫(yī)藥高質量發(fā)展研究”(2023-PP-05-03);中國醫(yī)學科學院醫(yī)學與健康科技創(chuàng)新工程:“珍稀藥用植物品質評價與資源保障關鍵技術研究”(2021-I2M-1-031)